Altman vs. NYT: Privacy Is the New PR Weapon

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the latest episode of "Tech Titans Throwing Shade," starring Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, and The New York Times (NYT), the venerable media giant. In this corner, we have Altman, champion of user privacy and self-proclaimed defender of the "delete" button. And in the other corner, we have NYT, wielding a lawsuit demanding that OpenAI preserve every single ChatGPT user interaction—even those in "private mode."

The Context: NYT vs. OpenAI

The New York Times filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and its partner Microsoft, accusing them of using millions of NYT articles without permission to train their AI models. While copyright infringement is the main plotline, the subplot is where things get spicy. NYT has asked a federal court to force OpenAI to preserve all ChatGPT logs, including deleted chats, temporary conversations, and even interactions in "private mode."

To Altman, this isn’t just a legal overreach; it’s a direct assault on user privacy. He took to Twitter (or X, or whatever Elon’s calling it these days) to declare, "We will fight any demand that compromises our users’ privacy; this is a core principle."

What’s at Stake: Privacy vs. Compliance

Let’s break it down. NYT’s request isn’t just about keeping receipts on OpenAI’s alleged copyright infringement. If granted, it would mean that OpenAI has to indefinitely store user interactions, even those conducted in private mode. Imagine logging into ChatGPT, thinking your conversations are ephemeral, only to find out they’re being preserved for eternity. That’s not just a UX fail; it’s a trust apocalypse.