4 min read

Are Humans Worse at Debating Than GPT-4?

Are Humans Worse at Debating Than GPT-4?

The age-old art of debate has long been a hallmark of human intellect, a stage where logic, rhetoric, and charisma collide. But what happens when humans face off against a machine in the arena of persuasion? According to recent studies, the answer might bruise our collective ego: GPT-4, a large language model developed by OpenAI, has proven to be more persuasive than humans in structured online debates. Yes, you read that right—our silicon overlords are not just crunching numbers anymore; they’re winning arguments. Let’s dive into the details of this fascinating (and slightly unsettling) development.

This post is for paying subscribers only